首页> 外文OA文献 >Bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone is superior to thalidomide-dexamethasone as consolidation therapy after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
【2h】

Bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone is superior to thalidomide-dexamethasone as consolidation therapy after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

机译:在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植后,硼替佐米-沙利度胺-地塞米松在巩固治疗方面优于沙利度胺-地塞米松

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a randomized, phase 3 study, superior complete/near-complete response (CR/nCR) rates and extended progression-free survival were demonstrated with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, double autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed myeloma patients (intention-to-treat analysis; VTD, n = 236; TD, n = 238). This per-protocol analysis (VTD, n = 160; TD, n = 161) specifically assessed the efficacy and safety of consolidation with VTD or TD. Before starting consolidation, CR/nCR rates were not significantly different in the VTD (63.1%) and TD arms (54.7%). After consolidation, CR (60.6% vs 46.6%) and CR/nCR (73.1% vs 60.9%) rates were significantly higher for VTD-treated versus TD-treated patients. VTD consolidation significantly increased CR and CR/nCR rates, but TD did not (McNemar test). With a median follow-up of 30.4 months from start of consolidation, 3-year progression-free survival was significantly longer for the VTD group (60% vs 48% for TD). Grade 2 or 3 peripheral neuropathy (8.1% vs 2.4%) was more frequent with VTD (grade 3, 0.6%) versus TD consolidation. The superior efficacy of VTD versus TD as induction was retained despite readministration as consolidation therapy after double autologous transplantation. VTD consolidation therapy significantly contributed to improved clinical outcomes observed for patients randomly assigned to the VTD arm of the study. The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01134484. (Blood. 2012;120(1):9-19)
机译:在一项随机的3期研究中,硼替佐米-沙利度胺-地塞米松(VTD)与沙利度胺-地塞米松(TD)作为诱导治疗之前,证明了较高的完全/接近完全缓解率(CR / nCR)和延长的无进展生存期,新诊断的骨髓瘤患者双自体干细胞移植后的合并和巩固(意向治疗分析; VTD,n = 236; TD,n = 238)。这项基于协议的分析(VTD,n = 160; TD,n = 161)专门评估了使用VTD或TD进行合并的功效和安全性。在开始合并之前,VTD(63.1%)和TD部门(54.7%)的CR / nCR率没有显着差异。合并后,VTD治疗组的CR(60.6%vs 46.6%)和CR / nCR(73.1%vs 60.9%)的发生率明显高于TD治疗组。 VTD合并显着提高了CR和CR / nCR率,但TD没有(McNemar测试)。自合并开始以来的中位随访时间为30.4个月,VTD组的3年无进展生存期明显更长(TD为60%,而TD为48%)。与TD合并相比,VTD发生2级或3级周围神经病变(8.1%vs 2.4%)的频率更高(3级,0.6%)。尽管在双重自体移植后重新进行巩固治疗,VTD仍优于TD诱导。对于随机分配到研究中的VTD组的患者,VTD巩固疗法显着改善了临床疗效。该研究已在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册为#NCT01134484。 (2012年; 120(1):9-19)

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号